Home > Policy + Issues > Agriculture


f t # e
North Carolina’s Fifth District has a rich tradition of farming and ranching. From tobacco and poultry to soybeans and grapes, our farmers and ranchers  produce some of the best agricultural products in the world. As our farmers and ranchers continue to be good stewards of North Carolina’s land, I am committed to promoting our local agriculture economy and actively engaging in the creation of responsible farm policies that honor taxpayers while protecting the way of life of North Carolina’s farming families. As a past member of the House Agriculture Committee, I have built a record as an agriculture policy reformer and will keep looking for ways in the 114th Congress to find innovative legislative solutions to ensure North Carolina’s farmers and ranchers are free to compete, adapt and seize opportunities to safely maximize production and meet the needs of America and the world.

Legislation pertaining to Agriculture sponsored or co-sponsored by Rep. Foxx in the 114th Congress:
H.R. 662:  Traditional Cigar Manufacturing and Small Business Jobs Preservation Act of 2015

Legislation pertaining to Agriculture sponsored or co-sponsored by Rep. Foxx in the 113th Congress:
H.R. 693: Sugar Reform Act of 2013
H.R. 979: Forest Products Fairness Act of 2013
H.Amdt.179Spending Safeguard Amendment to H.R. 1947Federal Agriculture Reform & Risk Management Act
H.Amdt.226Sunset Discretionary Programs Amendment to H.R. 1947: Federal Agriculture Reform & Risk Management Act
H.Amdt.220Crop Insurance Transparency Amendment to H.R. 1947: Federal Agriculture Reform & Risk Management Act

If you would like any more information about this or any other issue, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

Foxx on the Spending Safeguard Amendment:

“Taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay the difference whenever Congress gets its cost projections wrong, something that has been known to happen on numerous occasions. Under current law, if actual costs for the Farm Risk Management Election Program exceed Congressional Budget Office estimates, taxpayers will have to pay the full bill regardless. My Spending Safeguard Amendment that passed with bipartisan support caps mandatory spending right around CBO projection levels and thus puts a finite number on an otherwise infinite taxpayer liability.”

Background and Details:

The Foxx Spending Safeguard Amendment will cap spending on the Farm Risk Management Election program at 110% of CBO-predicted levels for the first five (5) years in which payments are disbursed (FY 2016 – 2020). In the event government’s cost projections prove completely wrong, this amendment will ensure taxpayers are not forced to automatically pay the difference between Washington’s mistake and reality.

H.R. 2642, the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management (FARRM) Act of 2013, is slated to cost taxpayers $940 billion over 10 years. The bill repeals the indefensible direct payments system, but replaces it with the “Farm Risk Management Election” program. This program alone is predicted to cost $23.37 billion over 10 years, but could cost more…much more. The 2008 Farm Bill cost taxpayers 51% more than its drafters predicted.

In the case of the Farm Risk Management Election Program, cost estimates are based on high target prices which exceed historical averages. If these target prices fall and the program’s costs increase beyond projections as a result, taxpayers will be forced to pay the difference.

This amendment will:
  • Safeguard taxpayers if this program ends up costing significantly more than advertised;
  • Prevent automatic, unappropriated spending from unexpectedly skyrocketing; and 
  • Set a striking new precedent for fiscal responsibility.

Foxx on the Sunset Discretionary Programs Amendment:

“President Ronald Reagan once famously commented on the seeming eternal nature of some federal government programs. Farm Bills to date have been rife with indefinitely authorized discretionary programs which don’t have to prove their mettle to continue drawing from the taxpayer dole. That is a travesty, and my Sunset Discretionary Programs Amendment will require the automatic expiration of all discretionary programs in the Farm Bill after five years unless Congress votes specifically to allow a program to continue.”

Background and Details:

The Sunset Discretionary Programs Amendment will automatically end discretionary programs in the 2013 Farm Bill upon expiration of the bill’s 5-year authorization period. Many programs authorized by the Farm Bill are wasteful, duplicative and ineffective, but are authorized indefinitely. This amendment will require Congress to justify a program’s continued existence and funding through regular reauthorization efforts.

As our national debt approaches $17 trillion, Congress simply cannot afford to add to the number of costly federal programs on auto-pilot.

This common-sense amendment will:
  • Prevent the covert continuance of wasteful, ineffective, and duplicative programs;
  • Send a strong message to stakeholders, lobbyists and special interests that discretionary federal programs have an expiration date.
  • Prompt Congress and the public to thoughtfully reexamine costly programs when the Farm Bill’s authorization expires; and
  • Require members of Congress to mount a strong defense for the continuation of any expired discretionary program at the end of the Farm Bill’s authorization period.
This amendment will NOT:
  • Eliminate or undermine the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); or
  • Apply to the farm bill’s mandatory spending provisions.

Foxx on the Crop Insurance Transparency Amendment:

“It shouldn’t take a FOIA request for the American people to figure out whether their leaders are personally benefiting from government farm subsidies. The Crop Insurance Transparency Amendment requires that information disclosing high-powered beneficiaries of taxpayer-funded subsidies be made available to the public without requiring a formal Freedom of Information Act request. Democrats and Republicans should all agree that requiring such transparency is commonsense.”

Background and Details:

The Crop Insurance Transparency Amendment, cosponsored by Congressman Keith Ellison (D-MN), will require the government to disclose the names of key persons or entities receiving federal crop insurance subsidies. Specifically, disclosure would be required for:
  • Members of Congress and their immediate families;
  • Cabinet Secretaries and their immediate families, and
  • Entities in which any of the preceding parties are majority shareholders.
This information is already recorded, but members of the public have to petition the government under the Freedom of Information Act to acquire the data. It shouldn’t take a FOIA request for the American people to figure out whether their leaders are receiving government farm subsidies. This bipartisan amendment makes this information available to the public without a FOIA request.
f t # e


"Thank you for keeping us informed about the Washington situation...I sincerely hope that you will try your very best to de-fund Obamacare." - Bill, Mocksville


"The federal government needs to rein in spending and re-work the tax code...There needs to be real changes." - David, Kernersville


"The only way to ensure a meaningful education is to provide students with teachers that are dedicated to them and their individual needs." - Mary, Hickory


"The number one issue that Congress should be working on is the economy, the smothering regulations and the mounting debt." - Jeff, Lewisville


"Please support our 2nd amendment rights at all cost." - Robert, Lewisville


"We MUST continue to send a message...that [government] cannot pick and choose which parts of the Constitution they will adhere to." - Patricia, Taylorsville


"Our children deserve a world-class education that will equip them to compete in the global economy." - Lorrie, Kernersville


"The right thing is not easy, pleasant or popular. It's hard work - just like what Americans do every day." - Jeff, Advance


"Paying for college is already hard enough for many students, increasing the borrowing rate is only going to make a bad problem worse." - Amy, Kernersville


"Stand firm to cut and eliminate waste!" - Joseph, Clemmons

Previous Next